Talk:EAI: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Created page with "What AI did you use to write these? I read the babysitter one and although it’s not as good as human writing it surprised me that it stayed on topic. I’ve used AI for art..." |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
What AI did you use to write these? I read the babysitter one and although it’s not as good as human writing it surprised me that it stayed on topic. I’ve used AI for artwork in my story [[User:Emily|Emily]] ([[User talk:Emily|talk]]) 01:25, 26 January 2023 (CET) | What AI did you use to write these? I read the babysitter one and although it’s not as good as human writing it surprised me that it stayed on topic. I’ve used AI for artwork in my story [[User:Emily|Emily]] ([[User talk:Emily|talk]]) 01:25, 26 January 2023 (CET) | ||
I use Novel AI. The Babysitter one used the more robust Krake model which is only availible at thee highest tier. It requires more initial text, which was why I didn't use it on the Pedodad one. You still need to keep the AI on track, but it isn't too difficult. --[[User:Elerneron|Elerneron]] ([[User talk:Elerneron|talk]]) 14:07, 26 January 2023 (CET) | |||
Latest revision as of 13:07, 26 January 2023
What AI did you use to write these? I read the babysitter one and although it’s not as good as human writing it surprised me that it stayed on topic. I’ve used AI for artwork in my story Emily (talk) 01:25, 26 January 2023 (CET)
I use Novel AI. The Babysitter one used the more robust Krake model which is only availible at thee highest tier. It requires more initial text, which was why I didn't use it on the Pedodad one. You still need to keep the AI on track, but it isn't too difficult. --Elerneron (talk) 14:07, 26 January 2023 (CET)