Talk:CandyStore: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
M/b option removed |
||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
Edit: I just saw the ''single'' Yaoi options. I'm more okay with moving the story to Meta than removing content unless we could get a hold of Linus12 to get permission. --[[User:Elerneron|Elerneron]] ([[User talk:Elerneron|talk]]) 06:01, 21 February 2021 (UTC) | Edit: I just saw the ''single'' Yaoi options. I'm more okay with moving the story to Meta than removing content unless we could get a hold of Linus12 to get permission. --[[User:Elerneron|Elerneron]] ([[User talk:Elerneron|talk]]) 06:01, 21 February 2021 (UTC) | ||
--- | |||
That single instance has been removed, I hadn't realized that was even there to which I apologize for. | |||
[[User:LoganY|LoganY]] ([[User talk:LoganY|talk]]) 07:11, 21 February 2021 (UTC) |
Revision as of 07:11, 21 February 2021
This story is in the "loli" section, there shouldn't be any shota interactions.
I have two suggestions
1 we delete the shota content, as it's technically vandalism
2 Because the story has been orphaned for some time, we can keep the edits made by LoganY and move the story to the meta section.
What do you think Elerneron?
Edit: could've sworn that the story was older --MrPib (talk) 01:09, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Straight Shota belongs, according to the original rules for the story section, in the Loli Stories section. These categories were copied from the forums, and would be better categorized as Straight/Yuri (Loli Stories), Yaoi (Shota Stories), and Any Stories that include furries (Furry Stories). Meta Stories was added later for combination Straight/Yaoi, Yuri/Yaoi, and Straight/Yuri/Yaoi stories. As this story has 9only straight shota, it is in the right category. I could ask Vistarrr about changing the names of the sections; but he has not responded to my recent communications...and it would be a lot of work to move things over. --Elerneron (talk) 05:57, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Edit: I just saw the single Yaoi options. I'm more okay with moving the story to Meta than removing content unless we could get a hold of Linus12 to get permission. --Elerneron (talk) 06:01, 21 February 2021 (UTC) --- That single instance has been removed, I hadn't realized that was even there to which I apologize for. LoganY (talk) 07:11, 21 February 2021 (UTC)