Talk:WeeklyWishes: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
The TLDR; each week will have a fresh poll, but items are not banned from showing up after they have lost. --[[User:Quiller|Quiller]] ([[User talk:Quiller|talk]]) 03:32, 3 June 2021 (UTC) | The TLDR; each week will have a fresh poll, but items are not banned from showing up after they have lost. --[[User:Quiller|Quiller]] ([[User talk:Quiller|talk]]) 03:32, 3 June 2021 (UTC) | ||
no, i meant if the effects of wishes pile up. so right now the age of consent is lowered to 5, but will that still be the case in the next week ? --[[User:Foalpoots|Foalpoots]] ([[User talk:Foalpoots|talk]]) 12:44, 3 June 2021 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 12:44, 3 June 2021
do the wishes persist between weeks and pile up, so wishes 1, 2, 3, and 4 would still be in action in week 5, or do the wishes only last one week ? --Foalpoots (talk) 22:50, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
I've kind of decided to do wishes one week at a time. If no one votes for an option, I don't want it to be in the next week's poll. If your request doesn't win, but you still want it, you may resubmit it for a week later down the line. i.e. not the consecutive week. The exception here is the second place in the poll. That one is carried over to the next week. I will also seed items in, but those will be random "normal" wishes that the non-perverts are wanting.
The TLDR; each week will have a fresh poll, but items are not banned from showing up after they have lost. --Quiller (talk) 03:32, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
no, i meant if the effects of wishes pile up. so right now the age of consent is lowered to 5, but will that still be the case in the next week ? --Foalpoots (talk) 12:44, 3 June 2021 (UTC)