User talk:Tod Naturlich: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
You didn't do anything wrong, there just isn't a subcategory page for the Winterkin yet, as there was no page referencing it. I'll create the category page. For future reference one can make a category page by clicking on the red link by Category: at the bottom of the page, adding a short description like <code><nowiki>An index of the pages in the story [[Invasion]].</nowiki></code> Then adding the type of story as the category or (as in this case) a parent category page. --[[User:Elerneron|Elerneron]] ([[User talk:Elerneron|talk]]) 16:28, 23 June 2017 (UTC) | You didn't do anything wrong, there just isn't a subcategory page for the Winterkin yet, as there was no page referencing it. I'll create the category page. For future reference one can make a category page by clicking on the red link by Category: at the bottom of the page, adding a short description like <code><nowiki>An index of the pages in the story [[Invasion]].</nowiki></code> Then adding the type of story as the category or (as in this case) a parent category page. --[[User:Elerneron|Elerneron]] ([[User talk:Elerneron|talk]]) 16:28, 23 June 2017 (UTC) | ||
Since gravity is directly proportional to mass (as opposed to radius), and they have already found a terrestrial planet that is 5x more massive than the earth in another solar system (Gliese 436 c.) I disagree with the gravity for the Markovik being a problem. A quick search reveals that (at least one expert) says that a terrestrial planet can be 5-10 times the mass of Earth before it has too much atmosphere and would be considered a gass giant. On that note, we could get even larger by having a gas giant that had its atmosphere ripped away in a cosmic catastrophe. | |||
You are correct about the fact that a more massive planet ''should'' have a thicker atmosphere. There are all kinds of things that can happen to a planet's atmosphere, it's a dangerous, unpredictable universe out there. | |||
(I do agree that Chromammalian planet defies the laws of physics as it currently stands BTW. I was thinking about saying something, but you beat me to it.) --[[User:Elerneron|Elerneron]] ([[User talk:Elerneron|talk]]) 14:45, 24 June 2017 (UTC) | |||
---- | ---- | ||
Revision as of 14:45, 24 June 2017
Leave your messages below, separated by a ----
Elerneron
You didn't do anything wrong, there just isn't a subcategory page for the Winterkin yet, as there was no page referencing it. I'll create the category page. For future reference one can make a category page by clicking on the red link by Category: at the bottom of the page, adding a short description like An index of the pages in the story [[Invasion]]. Then adding the type of story as the category or (as in this case) a parent category page. --Elerneron (talk) 16:28, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
Since gravity is directly proportional to mass (as opposed to radius), and they have already found a terrestrial planet that is 5x more massive than the earth in another solar system (Gliese 436 c.) I disagree with the gravity for the Markovik being a problem. A quick search reveals that (at least one expert) says that a terrestrial planet can be 5-10 times the mass of Earth before it has too much atmosphere and would be considered a gass giant. On that note, we could get even larger by having a gas giant that had its atmosphere ripped away in a cosmic catastrophe.
You are correct about the fact that a more massive planet should have a thicker atmosphere. There are all kinds of things that can happen to a planet's atmosphere, it's a dangerous, unpredictable universe out there.
(I do agree that Chromammalian planet defies the laws of physics as it currently stands BTW. I was thinking about saying something, but you beat me to it.) --Elerneron (talk) 14:45, 24 June 2017 (UTC)