Talk:Disciplinary Action
I was a bit ambivalent toward this story when reading it's name in the Recent Changes page, but I must admit, I am intrigued. The punishment guidelines, while odd, are also arousing. I look forward to more. What's the stance on suggestions? --Notsooldpervert (talk) 05:47, 4 September 2017 (CEST)
Thanks for giving the story a chance. I'm bad with names and titles, and I didn't stop to think that perhaps the title wouldn't give the best first impression. As stated in the story editing rules, all suggestions are not only welcome, but encouraged, either in the form of requests to fill a particular path, creation of new paths or directly writing part of the story. --Tod Naturlich (talk) 06:01, 4 September 2017 (CEST)
An idea of how to make this activity legal, and why the town is just now implimenting these measures... i'm thinking the supreme court has been revitalized with younger judges as they die off or retire. Now they lean more toward constitutional libertarian views. As such they sided with a state against federal law saying that under the constitution federal law is supposed to apply only to situations that affect the country as a whole. That means that state laws now supercede federal laws when it applies just to their state, and local laws supercede state level as long as it stays local. As long as he stays within the guidelines set down by the local governing body, he's perfectly covered legally. Except where his sister and niece/daughters are concerned. With him being discplinarian for the school, she could make the girls "legal" by putting them in school. It would be no time at all before their individuality landed them in his office. --Notsooldpervert (talk) 17:45, 10 October 2017 (CEST)