Talk:Yes/Chad/Take everyone to school normally

Got all day to plot my revenge, and as we found out at breakfast, we don't even need access to the two traitors to set them up for a fall. --Notsooldpervert (talk) 11:35, 11 January 2017 (CET)

Personally I think if Chad treats Gary too badly it will haunt him later. Gary is a victim in all this, just like Chad. --Elerneron (talk) 12:20, 11 January 2017 (CET)

In that case, all Chad has to do to start their downfall is just whisper, at any time, "You know Dana is just manipulating you, right Gary? You do know she doesn't really even like you, right?" Then he could probably just watch it all break down from the side lines, repair his friendship with Gary (with a few harsh biting reprimands and the friendship equivalent of a time-out period for his disloyalty,) and then plan a deeper revenge on Dana for later (the emotional turmoil of the breakup, realizing he was being used, and your disapproval will probably be enough punishment for him. And oh yes, they will be enough. That actually is quite the punishment for a highschool kid. As in, to the level you might have to intervene to keep him from committing suicide depending on his disposition.) Jemini (talk) 12:27, 11 January 2017 (CET)

I dunno... two years of sleeping with your girlfriend without letting you know is a pretty harsh thing to do to your best friend. That might be enough to sunder that relationship completely. Remember Chad is in highschool too, and she was putting him off with hand jobs and possibly an occasional bj, while at the same time willingly spread her legs for Garry (and who knows who else). For a teenager that would likely be unforgivable, especially if others knew of their infidelity. I do think that a public break up is a fine place to start, and you don't even need to whisper. Walk up to them in a nice public place and ask Garry "Don't you realize this two-timing whore is only using you to boost her popularity?" Then without giving him a chance to respond look at her and say, "Aren't you?" Her yes would probably drown out Garry's affirmative answer and you can fire back with , "Yes you're a two-timing whore? Or yes you're using him so people will like you?" And she has to publicly answer yes to both. Then dismiss them with " Don't you think it would be a good idea if you two went someplace else and stopped trying to sit with decent people?" Then they walk away and leave you surrounded by the other popular kids. I still like the gang bang creampie eating knock her up and let her brother see her fucking the dog punishment lol just think how vindictive you'd have been as a teenager if you had the power. Chad probably wouldn't be as bad as me, because he's popular and had less built up resentment --Notsooldpervert (talk) 19:03, 11 January 2017 (CET)

Minor detail, but "Does everyone...?" Is technically a question, so shouldn't they all be answering with "yes we do", even without knowing what they're responding to? --Jackmaster (talk) 19:55, 11 January 2017 (CET)

I think since his intent was to speak to his family, then they would be the ones that the question was directed at. --Notsooldpervert (talk) 23:31, 11 January 2017 (CET)

That's what I mean though; he technically asked his family a question so shouldn't have they responded with some form of yes related detail? It's a minor thing so not worth getting hung up on, it just stood out to me as I was adding. --Jackmaster (talk) 00:01, 12 January 2017 (CET)

There was no object to the sentence for them to respond to. Everyone does what? --Notsooldpervert (talk) 00:09, 12 January 2017 (CET)

"Does everyone" isn't a question. It isn't even a sentence. As noted, there is no object. There's nothing for the ring to work with. --Elerneron (talk) 09:38, 12 January 2017 (CET)