Difference between revisions of "Talk:Daycare manager/stats"
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
I'm quite sure of that, at LEAST by 1 full level per year (1 level being, as usual, equal to 5 points.) It may also start decreasing faster in the 9-12 range. That said though, what do you think of the idea of splitting social and sexual naivete? I actually had an interesting idea as I was drifting off to sleep (which was soon after finishing my revised version of the "exposure" stat) for naivete where we represent sexual knowledge with 8-10 specific pieces of sexual knowledge which are either "on" or "off," and each represent 5 points of naivete if they are in the "off" position. This would be sexual naivete, and then the other 50 points would be the social naivete. In order to be considered "sexually aware," the attribute that shifts sex acts from the domain of "touch" over to "love," they would need to be at somewhere around half or lower in both categories (because they would need a certain amount of social awareness as well in order for it to click that because this is sexual they need to be more guarded against it) At any rate, I will write it up like that so you can better see what I'm talking about before making a judgement call. [[User:Jemini|Jemini]] ([[User talk:Jemini|talk]]) 00:50, 15 June 2018 (CEST) | I'm quite sure of that, at LEAST by 1 full level per year (1 level being, as usual, equal to 5 points.) It may also start decreasing faster in the 9-12 range. That said though, what do you think of the idea of splitting social and sexual naivete? I actually had an interesting idea as I was drifting off to sleep (which was soon after finishing my revised version of the "exposure" stat) for naivete where we represent sexual knowledge with 8-10 specific pieces of sexual knowledge which are either "on" or "off," and each represent 5 points of naivete if they are in the "off" position. This would be sexual naivete, and then the other 50 points would be the social naivete. In order to be considered "sexually aware," the attribute that shifts sex acts from the domain of "touch" over to "love," they would need to be at somewhere around half or lower in both categories (because they would need a certain amount of social awareness as well in order for it to click that because this is sexual they need to be more guarded against it) At any rate, I will write it up like that so you can better see what I'm talking about before making a judgement call. [[User:Jemini|Jemini]] ([[User talk:Jemini|talk]]) 00:50, 15 June 2018 (CEST) | ||
Ok, I just updated Naivete to contain the information I was talking about above. [[User:Jemini|Jemini]] ([[User talk:Jemini|talk]]) 01:58, 15 June 2018 (CEST) | |||
Revision as of 23:58, 14 June 2018
Hollow: About the comfort zones and the trust: wouldn’t it be 6 levels? 50, 60, 70, 80, 90 snd 100?
-Face-palm- Bad math, thanks for the catch. Jemini (talk) 00:50, 15 June 2018 (CEST)
Naivete
Hollow: I think this value will also decrease automatically as the child grows older.
I'm quite sure of that, at LEAST by 1 full level per year (1 level being, as usual, equal to 5 points.) It may also start decreasing faster in the 9-12 range. That said though, what do you think of the idea of splitting social and sexual naivete? I actually had an interesting idea as I was drifting off to sleep (which was soon after finishing my revised version of the "exposure" stat) for naivete where we represent sexual knowledge with 8-10 specific pieces of sexual knowledge which are either "on" or "off," and each represent 5 points of naivete if they are in the "off" position. This would be sexual naivete, and then the other 50 points would be the social naivete. In order to be considered "sexually aware," the attribute that shifts sex acts from the domain of "touch" over to "love," they would need to be at somewhere around half or lower in both categories (because they would need a certain amount of social awareness as well in order for it to click that because this is sexual they need to be more guarded against it) At any rate, I will write it up like that so you can better see what I'm talking about before making a judgement call. Jemini (talk) 00:50, 15 June 2018 (CEST)
Ok, I just updated Naivete to contain the information I was talking about above. Jemini (talk) 01:58, 15 June 2018 (CEST)