Talk:Sexual Research Commission/Carter/1

With the mom dad and brother going naked too, wouldn't that take away the embarrassment factor for the girls being naked all the time? I can see P-FANS leading to laws like Nature's Way and CLIT, but if they're already in place would you even need something like the study in the first place? Not that I don't like nude families fucking like bunnies lol --Notsooldpervert (talk) 06:21, 10 January 2022 (CET)

Since most of the kids are so young, they won't see much unusual about being naked or having sex. I was thinking that would be for the 14 year old and the parents, since they are more used to the previous situation. --Cum Girl (talk) 07:10, 10 January 2022 (CET)

I can see the parents allowing it at home, but not in public. Maybe have an addendum for the study that women over the age of 18 can volunteer, but if they do they're bound by the rules the same as the under age girls until they are released from the study. Mom did it, ostensibly to support her daughters, but in reality mom's a perv eager to be fucked by strangers while watching her daughters be fucked by lots of men. I also think the anti-pregnancy thing should only apply to the underage girls (though I agree with Elerneron that no preggo is a disappointment), and that Mom should get knocked up never knowing if it's her hubby's or a strangers. Another girl she can raise in the program from birth. --Notsooldpervert (talk) 16:10, 10 January 2022 (CET)

Yeah, preventing the adults from getting pregnant reduces the risk and jeopardizes the study as a whole.

If the adult women participating can't get pregnant or say no, this gives men an "out." Do they have sex with a child a be branded a pedo by their peers, or do they fuck a consenting adult with zero downsides?

If the program were changed so that the adults have a reduced chance of becoming pregnant (ie, a shot that changes the acidity levels of the vaginal fluids, killing most of the male sperm, so that those "vaccinated"have an 80% chance of producing female offspring. Although, the adults are just told it lowers their risk of pregnancy.) Then the males would have an incentive to fuck the minors, since they can't get pregnant.

Unrelated, but hopefully this doesn't turn into a rehash of your other story "free use universe" --MrPib (talk) 23:30, 10 January 2022 (CET)

Here’s a thought in an effort to please everybody, because I really think it would be great to have one story everyone can be excited about contributing to. Since different states have different laws, we could specify some states that aren’t as strict about certain aspects of the program and/or have laws that completely differ from other states. --Hgcollins (talk) 00:07, 11 January 2022 (CET)

I've read the comments here, and I've thought about this first chapter a bit. I want to make sure this storyline remains unique from my other stories, and focus primarily on the girls and their state of forced nudity and sex. I've published a revised edition of this first chapter:
The dad is no longer naked, the boy can wear whatever he wants (but can be nude voluntarily, and obviously can have sex). More focus on the girls and their nudity and sexuality.

I think Hgcollins's suggestion is really good. We can fit all the different variants of stories in the same group by simply inventing different jurisdictions with different laws that make it all work. It's similar to what NudeWorldOrder / Brave Nude World do to reconcile different rules.

As for MrPib commenting about being branded a pedo, one of the core aspects of the stories by OddR is that society is being massively modified to remove that stigma, so that having sex with children is no different from having sex with adults. So people may be surprised seeing a 5 year old get fucked on the park bench, but when they're told it's healthy or for a study or something, they'll accept it and move on. --Cum Girl (talk) 08:41, 11 January 2022 (CET)