Talk:Yes/Chad/Take Maebh's deal: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
True . . . maybe I should add that on the page instead. Then again, he's been pretty on the ball recently . . . maybe it's better to ''not'' have him think of that solution in this instance. No one is perfect after all. --[[User:Elerneron|Elerneron]] ([[User talk:Elerneron|talk]]) 22:42, 10 January 2017 (CET) | True . . . maybe I should add that on the page instead. Then again, he's been pretty on the ball recently . . . maybe it's better to ''not'' have him think of that solution in this instance. No one is perfect after all. --[[User:Elerneron|Elerneron]] ([[User talk:Elerneron|talk]]) 22:42, 10 January 2017 (CET) | ||
I apologize, but I can barely read the agreement. I am not sure if it is the font or the text size, so I am not sure as to how it can be improved. | |||
Revision as of 22:29, 10 January 2017
Need to know what those stipulations are before we sign. Don't want to break one without knowing what it is. Sign it when we're better informed. Or just ask ourselves if we know what it's talking about. Then we'll know.
True . . . maybe I should add that on the page instead. Then again, he's been pretty on the ball recently . . . maybe it's better to not have him think of that solution in this instance. No one is perfect after all. --Elerneron (talk) 22:42, 10 January 2017 (CET)
I apologize, but I can barely read the agreement. I am not sure if it is the font or the text size, so I am not sure as to how it can be improved.