Difference between revisions of "File talk:Life Hacks Lilly 2.png"
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
I can see that being an issue. If nothing else though, I think a 5-year-old image that is at least not dressed like a 5-year-old may work for Lilly. (again to the previous image that actually had a kindergarten name-tag.) [[User:Jemini|Jemini]] ([[User talk:Jemini|talk]]) 06:09, 23 April 2018 (CEST) | I can see that being an issue. If nothing else though, I think a 5-year-old image that is at least not dressed like a 5-year-old may work for Lilly. (again to the previous image that actually had a kindergarten name-tag.) [[User:Jemini|Jemini]] ([[User talk:Jemini|talk]]) 06:09, 23 April 2018 (CEST) | ||
I'll see what other images I can find. If nothing else this will save you time when you have a new character to introduce. --[[User:Quiller|Quiller]] ([[User talk:Quiller|talk]]) 07:48, 23 April 2018 (CEST) | |||
Revision as of 05:48, 23 April 2018
Oh, just found this image. Yes, this is a bit more appropriate for Lilly, although the build kinda makes her look closer to 11 than 7 I think. The legs and arms would need to be a bit shorter proportionately, that length shows signs that she has already begun the early growth phases of puberty. Jemini (talk) 04:37, 23 April 2018 (CEST)
Yeah, finding images of lolis falls into 4 categories. 13 years old, 10 years old, 5 years old and toddlers. It makes things difficult. --Quiller (talk) 05:48, 23 April 2018 (CEST)
I can see that being an issue. If nothing else though, I think a 5-year-old image that is at least not dressed like a 5-year-old may work for Lilly. (again to the previous image that actually had a kindergarten name-tag.) Jemini (talk) 06:09, 23 April 2018 (CEST)
I'll see what other images I can find. If nothing else this will save you time when you have a new character to introduce. --Quiller (talk) 07:48, 23 April 2018 (CEST)
