Difference between revisions of "Talk:Disciplinary Action"
TodNaturlich (talk | contribs) (About the Law) |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
An idea of how to make this activity legal, and why the town is just now implimenting these measures... i'm thinking the supreme court has been revitalized with younger judges as they die off or retire. Now they lean more toward constitutional libertarian views. As such they sided with a state against federal law saying that under the constitution federal law is supposed to apply only to situations that affect the country as a whole. That means that state laws now supercede federal laws when it applies just to their state, and local laws supercede state level as long as it stays local. As long as he stays within the guidelines set down by the local governing body, he's perfectly covered legally. Except where his sister and niece/daughters are concerned. With him being discplinarian for the school, she could make the girls "legal" by putting them in school. It would be no time at all before their individuality landed them in his office. --[[User:Notsooldpervert|Notsooldpervert]] ([[User talk:Notsooldpervert|talk]]) 17:45, 10 October 2017 (CEST) | An idea of how to make this activity legal, and why the town is just now implimenting these measures... i'm thinking the supreme court has been revitalized with younger judges as they die off or retire. Now they lean more toward constitutional libertarian views. As such they sided with a state against federal law saying that under the constitution federal law is supposed to apply only to situations that affect the country as a whole. That means that state laws now supercede federal laws when it applies just to their state, and local laws supercede state level as long as it stays local. As long as he stays within the guidelines set down by the local governing body, he's perfectly covered legally. Except where his sister and niece/daughters are concerned. With him being discplinarian for the school, she could make the girls "legal" by putting them in school. It would be no time at all before their individuality landed them in his office. --[[User:Notsooldpervert|Notsooldpervert]] ([[User talk:Notsooldpervert|talk]]) 17:45, 10 October 2017 (CEST) | ||
---- | |||
The idea of town accepting some form of ''concubinage'' has merit. It can be seen as the ''lesser evil'' in cases where a single male makes two girls pregnant, so neither family loses face. I will keep it in mind if the situation presents itself. As far as the ''legality'' of what's happening in town, we haven't even established a concrete location or time period for the town, and it might just be they are isolated enough that they can disregard outside laws, or they have enough political pull to do so. If it ever becomes relevant we might decide to use your suggestion, but for now I feel it's enough to accept it at face value. --[[User:Tod Naturlich|Tod Naturlich]] ([[User talk:Tod Naturlich|talk]]) 00:21, 11 October 2017 (CEST) | |||
Revision as of 22:21, 10 October 2017
I was a bit ambivalent toward this story when reading it's name in the Recent Changes page, but I must admit, I am intrigued. The punishment guidelines, while odd, are also arousing. I look forward to more. What's the stance on suggestions? --Notsooldpervert (talk) 05:47, 4 September 2017 (CEST)
Thanks for giving the story a chance. I'm bad with names and titles, and I didn't stop to think that perhaps the title wouldn't give the best first impression. As stated in the story editing rules, all suggestions are not only welcome, but encouraged, either in the form of requests to fill a particular path, creation of new paths or directly writing part of the story. --Tod Naturlich (talk) 06:01, 4 September 2017 (CEST)
An idea of how to make this activity legal, and why the town is just now implimenting these measures... i'm thinking the supreme court has been revitalized with younger judges as they die off or retire. Now they lean more toward constitutional libertarian views. As such they sided with a state against federal law saying that under the constitution federal law is supposed to apply only to situations that affect the country as a whole. That means that state laws now supercede federal laws when it applies just to their state, and local laws supercede state level as long as it stays local. As long as he stays within the guidelines set down by the local governing body, he's perfectly covered legally. Except where his sister and niece/daughters are concerned. With him being discplinarian for the school, she could make the girls "legal" by putting them in school. It would be no time at all before their individuality landed them in his office. --Notsooldpervert (talk) 17:45, 10 October 2017 (CEST)
The idea of town accepting some form of concubinage has merit. It can be seen as the lesser evil in cases where a single male makes two girls pregnant, so neither family loses face. I will keep it in mind if the situation presents itself. As far as the legality of what's happening in town, we haven't even established a concrete location or time period for the town, and it might just be they are isolated enough that they can disregard outside laws, or they have enough political pull to do so. If it ever becomes relevant we might decide to use your suggestion, but for now I feel it's enough to accept it at face value. --Tod Naturlich (talk) 00:21, 11 October 2017 (CEST)