Talk:Disciplinary Action/Before school/Practical interview/Sylvia (chain strip gag)/Tatiana/Strip and bind wrists/Scold/Something wrong/Gentle questioning/Ungag/Question/Continue/Lesbianism/Yes/No/Assure

Maybe we can do the displaced punishment, by having both of them move in (mainly Sylvia but adding Tatiana because of the fact that Sylvia acted for Tatiana's benefit) until at least one of the following is completed:

• Birth children. Tatiana (1), Sylvia (2)
• Graduate from St. André Truitt

Because of the girl's current inability to bear children, due to their young age, a further punishment will be placed:

• The children's parental rights have been temporarily suspended and their parents are forbidden from interacting with the children. (Doesn't include siblings, as they may also still be enrolled in school.
  • violations of this rule, by either parent, will automatically escalate to forced impregnation for the mothers and all female siblings that have gone through puberty.

(Just a threat, don't act upon it.)

And then, because the event(s) took place outside of the school, we can possibly lessen the punishment to an extent. Maybe have them wear kid's pajamas (the girls pick out horse themedonsies) and have to have a faculty member watch them in the toilet.

Part of lessening, is that John might be afraid of going too far and having Mr. Granville retaliating. Possibly have Mr. Granville reassure that whatever we dole out, we have the final say. His voice becoming more gruff and intimidating, "but don't think you'll have free rein to do as you please."

Another part of wanting to lessen their punishment is the fact that they will be in his sister's class and he definitely doesn't want to be on her bad side. (At this point in time, does John even know that she teaches third grade?) --MrPib (talk) 19:25, 13 February 2024 (UTC)

Isn't it awfully fast to jump straight to forcing them to live with John? He barely even has the job yet. This is his interview. Maybe punish, and keep bringing them back for more punishments later to justify moving them in with John after more of their wrongdoings are on the record? --Notsooldpervert (talk) 19:49, 13 February 2024 (UTC)

As per Mr. Granville's exact words:

"I can't be giving my family special treatment, Mr. Gardner. If anything, it is because she's my daughter that we need to make this punishment especially harsh. What she did is something outrageous, so her punishment should be the harshest available."

As of now on the timeline, the only options are

• loss of virginity.
• Deep internal ejaculation

However, none of the listed infractions and punishments can even compare to homosexual acts; a new category may need to be drafted and passed by legal.

Our punishment for them can be the catalyst for implementing the extreme infraction category. This would make Mr. Granville's reaction to Liliana's impending punishment, just that much more impactful.

Furthermore, as "homosexual acts" are an uncharted territory and the fact that every parent signed off on it (we know this isn't true. Some wives, some single mothers and the ladies at the brothel, didn't have a say), we sort of have carte blanche to do as we please. We just need Mr. Granville's sign off and we're golden. --MrPib (talk) 21:37, 13 February 2024 (UTC)