Talk:Disciplinary Action/Student pubescent status: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
I didn't mean to leave it so vague, but I might just leave it in order to see how people (including Gemma herself) react, if you do decide to go down that route | I didn't mean to leave it so vague, but I might just leave it in order to see how people (including Gemma herself) react, if you do decide to go down that route | ||
--[[User:MrPib|MrPib]] ([[User talk:MrPib|talk]]) 09:39, 22 December 2019 (UTC) | --[[User:MrPib|MrPib]] ([[User talk:MrPib|talk]]) 09:39, 22 December 2019 (UTC) | ||
I thought the treatment would also make it easier for the little ones to adapt to full sex. If that's the case, why are the already pubescent ones removed from the study? Wouldn't they still be part of the secondary study? It's been a while since I read the lead up to this path, so I might be mistaken. --[[User:Notsooldpervert|Notsooldpervert]] ([[User talk:Notsooldpervert|talk]]) 21:42, 27 May 2022 (CEST) |
Revision as of 19:42, 27 May 2022
Made some minor changes, by addingSuperscript and putting the "reference symbol" at the bottom.
I'm also curious why Luana isn't on the pill. --MrPib (talk) 06:37, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Mostly because I forgot somehow. Will change that now. Jemini (talk) 07:03, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
In the Guerra females (including Catrina's mom), will Dr. Hartnell do a blood test to check the Estradiol levels? It's a type of estrogen that if high, can either indicate a (false) positive pregnancy, or something wrong with the ovaries.
I also unintentionally left Gemma's bio just ambiguous enough to make you think she's an XY female
- No body hair (testosterone required)
- Too much estrogen (either converting too much testosterone to estrogen,hyperfertile, or no testosterone at all)
- Underdeveloped vaginal canal (no body hair or period plus this, is a clear sign that they might be a boy)
I didn't mention her not having a period, so it's possible that she is actually male and suffers from Complete Androgen Insensitivity Syndrome.
I didn't mean to leave it so vague, but I might just leave it in order to see how people (including Gemma herself) react, if you do decide to go down that route --MrPib (talk) 09:39, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
I thought the treatment would also make it easier for the little ones to adapt to full sex. If that's the case, why are the already pubescent ones removed from the study? Wouldn't they still be part of the secondary study? It's been a while since I read the lead up to this path, so I might be mistaken. --Notsooldpervert (talk) 21:42, 27 May 2022 (CEST)