Talk:Disciplinary Action/Disciplinary Office/First Week/Perl/PJs/Wet: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
TodNaturlich (talk | contribs) Thanks for the tip (hoping tip is singular) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Reading back over this, I thought about saying something the 1st time and I should have, not sure why I didn't. At any rate, once again, the term "Pajamas" and "PJs" are always treated as pluralized with the exception of if you are talking about a singular "pajama" covered person, body, or body part. Or, if you are talking about it in the abstract, such as "Pearl was issued the pajama punishment." Outside of those two scenarios, pajamas are always treated as plural in the same way that pants are plural. That means not only pluralizing it by adding the s at the end, but also using plural speech in connection with anything that refers to the pajamas. [[User:Jemini|Jemini]] ([[User talk:Jemini|talk]]) 07:02, 16 November 2017 (CET) | Reading back over this, I thought about saying something the 1st time and I should have, not sure why I didn't. At any rate, once again, the term "Pajamas" and "PJs" are always treated as pluralized with the exception of if you are talking about a singular "pajama" covered person, body, or body part. Or, if you are talking about it in the abstract, such as "Pearl was issued the pajama punishment." Outside of those two scenarios, pajamas are always treated as plural in the same way that pants are plural. That means not only pluralizing it by adding the s at the end, but also using plural speech in connection with anything that refers to the pajamas. [[User:Jemini|Jemini]] ([[User talk:Jemini|talk]]) 07:02, 16 November 2017 (CET) | ||
---- | |||
Pants are plural!!?? English continues to baffle me. Thanks for taking the time to give me these gems of knowledge. I'll try to correct this and stop making this mistake in the future. --[[User:Tod Naturlich|Tod Naturlich]] ([[User talk:Tod Naturlich|talk]]) 07:33, 16 November 2017 (CET) | |||
Revision as of 06:33, 16 November 2017
Reading back over this, I thought about saying something the 1st time and I should have, not sure why I didn't. At any rate, once again, the term "Pajamas" and "PJs" are always treated as pluralized with the exception of if you are talking about a singular "pajama" covered person, body, or body part. Or, if you are talking about it in the abstract, such as "Pearl was issued the pajama punishment." Outside of those two scenarios, pajamas are always treated as plural in the same way that pants are plural. That means not only pluralizing it by adding the s at the end, but also using plural speech in connection with anything that refers to the pajamas. Jemini (talk) 07:02, 16 November 2017 (CET)
Pants are plural!!?? English continues to baffle me. Thanks for taking the time to give me these gems of knowledge. I'll try to correct this and stop making this mistake in the future. --Tod Naturlich (talk) 07:33, 16 November 2017 (CET)