Talk:Disciplinary Action/Disciplinary Office/First Quarter/Interviews: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Created page with "I thought we needed this. A lot of the punishments for boys have comments in the discussion session about having them become sex-toys of the PE teacher / Soccer coach, but it..." |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I thought we needed this. A lot of the punishments for boys have comments in the discussion session about having them become sex-toys of the PE teacher / Soccer coach, but it is only by meta-knowledge we know that he's gay with an interest in young boys. The primary purpose of this is to give us an in-universe way to know about his suitability to this role, but I also thought it would be a good way to flesh out and get to know the rest of the staff. [[User:Jemini|Jemini]] ([[User talk:Jemini|talk]]) 23:49, 30 December 2017 (CET) | I thought we needed this. A lot of the punishments for boys have comments in the discussion session about having them become sex-toys of the PE teacher / Soccer coach, but it is only by meta-knowledge we know that he's gay with an interest in young boys. The primary purpose of this is to give us an in-universe way to know about his suitability to this role, but I also thought it would be a good way to flesh out and get to know the rest of the staff. [[User:Jemini|Jemini]] ([[User talk:Jemini|talk]]) 23:49, 30 December 2017 (CET) | ||
Makes sense to me, though John will have to do some serious talking and probing to get males to admit interest in boys, especially during the first week. --[[User:Telgar|Telgar]] ([[User talk:Telgar|talk]]) 13:18, 30 December 2017 (PST) | |||
Revision as of 23:18, 30 December 2017
I thought we needed this. A lot of the punishments for boys have comments in the discussion session about having them become sex-toys of the PE teacher / Soccer coach, but it is only by meta-knowledge we know that he's gay with an interest in young boys. The primary purpose of this is to give us an in-universe way to know about his suitability to this role, but I also thought it would be a good way to flesh out and get to know the rest of the staff. Jemini (talk) 23:49, 30 December 2017 (CET)
Makes sense to me, though John will have to do some serious talking and probing to get males to admit interest in boys, especially during the first week. --Telgar (talk) 13:18, 30 December 2017 (PST)