Talk:Disciplinary Action/Disciplinary Office/First Quarter/Boys: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
I was actually thinking something incredibly similar, the difference being that it's something that's worked together with the girls. Basically, Mr. Gardner works out the paramiters of the girl's punishment, and then sets an addition to it where every single time one of the girls comes in to receive a vaginal ejaculation, both of the boys go to Mr. Goodman. And, the girls get to decide for themselves how many times they receive that punishment, and the decision does not need to be up front. In other words, they can decide on their own to come to you and have sex in order to make the boys have to endure another round of punishment for themselves. (There ought to be a minimum number of times that the girls are required to take a punishment, but no maximum. If they find that the punishment is enjoyable for themselves, they might just all start liking it over the course of their minimum number and all start seeking more.) [[User:Jemini|Jemini]] ([[User talk:Jemini|talk]]) 13:31, 28 February 2020 (CET) | I was actually thinking something incredibly similar, the difference being that it's something that's worked together with the girls. Basically, Mr. Gardner works out the paramiters of the girl's punishment, and then sets an addition to it where every single time one of the girls comes in to receive a vaginal ejaculation, both of the boys go to Mr. Goodman. And, the girls get to decide for themselves how many times they receive that punishment, and the decision does not need to be up front. In other words, they can decide on their own to come to you and have sex in order to make the boys have to endure another round of punishment for themselves. (There ought to be a minimum number of times that the girls are required to take a punishment, but no maximum. If they find that the punishment is enjoyable for themselves, they might just all start liking it over the course of their minimum number and all start seeking more.) [[User:Jemini|Jemini]] ([[User talk:Jemini|talk]]) 13:31, 28 February 2020 (CET) | ||
---- | |||
Another thought I had for the girls goes along the lines of damaging property. Since the two boys damaged Mr. Gardner's property, Mary, and because of that damage they will be unavailable to carry out her wifely duties, sex, the boys will have to. However Mr. Gardner doesn't want the boys, and the girls are only in trouble in reaction do to the boys original actions, so the responsibility of replacing Mr. Gardner's property will be displaced to the girls. The girls will be legally considered his wives and property for the duration of their punishment, but only in regards to wifely duties. The duration of their punishment will be minimum until pregnancy with the maximum to be determined by Mr. Gardner and each girl. Any child produced by such union will be legally Mr. Gardner's and one of his wives. Once the punishment is completed the girls will return to an unmarried status and no wifely duties carried out by them will be counted against their purity. | |||
this has precident from biblical story of Abraham, where his wife was baren so another woman was used to carry out her wifely duties and no sin was attributed to the surrogate. I was talking thinking of having Mr. Gardner call the Deacon, as the wounded party, explain what happened and get his Blessing. In this way the girls get their "punishment" but keep their purity as a reward for coming to the aid of Mary. [[User:Telgar|Telgar]] ([[User talk:Telgar|talk]]) 06:00, 28 February 2020 (PST) |
Revision as of 14:00, 28 February 2020
I leave the boys punishment to someone else, hoever in my mind currently, the harshest punishment would be to require both boys to report to Me. Goodman every time any of the girls receive a punishment. While they are in his care, he is allowed to do anything he wishes to them even if it breaks them mentally or physically, he just can't do anything that would result in permanent physical injury or death. Telgar (talk) 01:05, 27 February 2020 (PST)
I was actually thinking something incredibly similar, the difference being that it's something that's worked together with the girls. Basically, Mr. Gardner works out the paramiters of the girl's punishment, and then sets an addition to it where every single time one of the girls comes in to receive a vaginal ejaculation, both of the boys go to Mr. Goodman. And, the girls get to decide for themselves how many times they receive that punishment, and the decision does not need to be up front. In other words, they can decide on their own to come to you and have sex in order to make the boys have to endure another round of punishment for themselves. (There ought to be a minimum number of times that the girls are required to take a punishment, but no maximum. If they find that the punishment is enjoyable for themselves, they might just all start liking it over the course of their minimum number and all start seeking more.) Jemini (talk) 13:31, 28 February 2020 (CET)
Another thought I had for the girls goes along the lines of damaging property. Since the two boys damaged Mr. Gardner's property, Mary, and because of that damage they will be unavailable to carry out her wifely duties, sex, the boys will have to. However Mr. Gardner doesn't want the boys, and the girls are only in trouble in reaction do to the boys original actions, so the responsibility of replacing Mr. Gardner's property will be displaced to the girls. The girls will be legally considered his wives and property for the duration of their punishment, but only in regards to wifely duties. The duration of their punishment will be minimum until pregnancy with the maximum to be determined by Mr. Gardner and each girl. Any child produced by such union will be legally Mr. Gardner's and one of his wives. Once the punishment is completed the girls will return to an unmarried status and no wifely duties carried out by them will be counted against their purity.
this has precident from biblical story of Abraham, where his wife was baren so another woman was used to carry out her wifely duties and no sin was attributed to the surrogate. I was talking thinking of having Mr. Gardner call the Deacon, as the wounded party, explain what happened and get his Blessing. In this way the girls get their "punishment" but keep their purity as a reward for coming to the aid of Mary. Telgar (talk) 06:00, 28 February 2020 (PST)