Talk:Disciplinary Action/Disciplinary Office/Before school/Visit/School/Memo/Questions/Excited/Question/Pause/Delay: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
Why separate the punishments this way, instead of escalating based on the combined infractions, you ask? Well, this way, Mr. Grandville can see how we handle two separate infraction levels. --[[User:MrPib|MrPib]] ([[User talk:MrPib|talk]]) 06:57, 23 January 2024 (UTC) | Why separate the punishments this way, instead of escalating based on the combined infractions, you ask? Well, this way, Mr. Grandville can see how we handle two separate infraction levels. --[[User:MrPib|MrPib]] ([[User talk:MrPib|talk]]) 06:57, 23 January 2024 (UTC) | ||
And with the current, smaller infraction "on their record", it justifies upping the punishment for the more serious one. I thought someone fighting or doing something violent on someone else's behalf, the protector and protectee both got the same punishment, not just punishing the one being protected instead. This could really be split into 3 different infractions. Petty vandalism, assault, and the "deviant sexual behavior" that brought them there in the first place. Punish them as normal for the vandalism since they did it together. Then punish them for Sylvie's assault on the principle, while emphasizing that Tatiana is only being punished, too, because the assault was "on her behalf". Then do the punishment for being caught in 69 (possibly elevated because they're now serial delinquents). --[[User:Notsooldpervert|Notsooldpervert]] ([[User talk:Notsooldpervert|talk]]) 14:57, 23 January 2024 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 14:57, 23 January 2024
For this infraction, I was thinking about spanking their bottoms, with Sylvie's being her bare bottom. Tatiana's outburst complicates my idea. I'll think about it some more, while awaiting other's input. --MrPib (talk) 02:16, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
Actually, the guidelines seem to specifically discourage spanking.
Experience has shown that short-term physical punishments yield short-term improvements in the students, and may even backfire, triggering in the student a rebellious response. These guidelines, therefore, will focus on alternative forms of punishment that will leave a deeper mark on the students and will minimize the chance of rejection.
Jemini (talk) 05:12, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
You're right! Hmm... Would making Tatiana suck on a pacifier, stripping the girls' lower clothing (for today) and have Sylvie's pussy played with by Mr. Grandville, be suitable?
Frame it as some sort of recompense for hurting him, while also bring up that doing this sort of stuff should really only be done by their husbands, or a parent if they were cleaning a baby's privates. Then segue into the main event.
Then we can figure out how to do the next level of punishment.
Why separate the punishments this way, instead of escalating based on the combined infractions, you ask? Well, this way, Mr. Grandville can see how we handle two separate infraction levels. --MrPib (talk) 06:57, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
And with the current, smaller infraction "on their record", it justifies upping the punishment for the more serious one. I thought someone fighting or doing something violent on someone else's behalf, the protector and protectee both got the same punishment, not just punishing the one being protected instead. This could really be split into 3 different infractions. Petty vandalism, assault, and the "deviant sexual behavior" that brought them there in the first place. Punish them as normal for the vandalism since they did it together. Then punish them for Sylvie's assault on the principle, while emphasizing that Tatiana is only being punished, too, because the assault was "on her behalf". Then do the punishment for being caught in 69 (possibly elevated because they're now serial delinquents). --Notsooldpervert (talk) 14:57, 23 January 2024 (UTC)