Difference between revisions of "Talk:Life Hacks/Charity-preg/Chrty pick + (kinder)78 pick/Rape girl - Billie/Mother4/Billy les/4+father/Outside debate/Younger/TrustExperiment/False"
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
The idea is that he's sexually ignorant, and as such is a little hung up on the part about seeing and touching privates as "wrong" because "it's wrong" and no other reason. Basically, because his sex knowledge has been erased by the cheat, it also removed his knowledge of the fact that you have to see and touch privates in order to have sex. So, he can approve of you having any kind of romantic relationship with his daughter despite the age gap, up to and including marriage, due to the instant approval. He would approve of you kissing her without a problem. But, as a parent, he has to teach you not to go doing stuff like seeing her privates. (Also, to him, seeing her changing clothes and having full blown vaginal sex with her are the same thing. That's in the sense of vaginal sex being seen as more mild to the same level as most people view seeing a girl changing.) In other words, this path is happening because I like the idea of the program conflicting and creating very weird results. [[User:Jemini|Jemini]] ([[User talk:Jemini|talk]]) 10:07, 3 March 2021 (UTC) | The idea is that he's sexually ignorant, and as such is a little hung up on the part about seeing and touching privates as "wrong" because "it's wrong" and no other reason. Basically, because his sex knowledge has been erased by the cheat, it also removed his knowledge of the fact that you have to see and touch privates in order to have sex. So, he can approve of you having any kind of romantic relationship with his daughter despite the age gap, up to and including marriage, due to the instant approval. He would approve of you kissing her without a problem. But, as a parent, he has to teach you not to go doing stuff like seeing her privates. (Also, to him, seeing her changing clothes and having full blown vaginal sex with her are the same thing. That's in the sense of vaginal sex being seen as more mild to the same level as most people view seeing a girl changing.) In other words, this path is happening because I like the idea of the program conflicting and creating very weird results. [[User:Jemini|Jemini]] ([[User talk:Jemini|talk]]) 10:07, 3 March 2021 (UTC) | ||
Also, yes, he was triggered by the factor of you wanting to take her off alone. He would probably be a lot less resistant if it was done right in front of him. [[User:Jemini|Jemini]] ([[User talk:Jemini|talk]]) 10:23, 3 March 2021 (UTC) | Also, yes, he was triggered by the factor of you wanting to take her off alone. He would probably be a lot less resistant if it was done right in front of him from the start. He was even willing to allow the sexual contact at the start, and really the reason he keeps driving at it now has more to do with the fact he got on this kick and doesn't want to back down from what he's already argued. That's an even bigger factor than what I said a moment ago (in the above paragraph.) [[User:Jemini|Jemini]] ([[User talk:Jemini|talk]]) 10:23, 3 March 2021 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 10:25, 3 March 2021
Since there was a vote for convincing the guy you were an 8 year old girl on the last list of options, I just decided to go with it for the next step to proceed the conversation. I was a little eager to write something and not so willing to wait. Jemini (talk) 00:01, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
Shouldn't the instant approval cheat make this whole path moot? With that on, he'd have approved of the 15 yo Xander playing with his daughter's privates, and would only possibly have the trust issue of him taking her out of view. He would approve it happening right in front of him, and with the greater trust for the experiment would show you the threshold where he would let you take the girl someplace else to fuck her (high enough, just take her home with you tonight lol). --Notsooldpervert (talk) 07:24, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
The idea is that he's sexually ignorant, and as such is a little hung up on the part about seeing and touching privates as "wrong" because "it's wrong" and no other reason. Basically, because his sex knowledge has been erased by the cheat, it also removed his knowledge of the fact that you have to see and touch privates in order to have sex. So, he can approve of you having any kind of romantic relationship with his daughter despite the age gap, up to and including marriage, due to the instant approval. He would approve of you kissing her without a problem. But, as a parent, he has to teach you not to go doing stuff like seeing her privates. (Also, to him, seeing her changing clothes and having full blown vaginal sex with her are the same thing. That's in the sense of vaginal sex being seen as more mild to the same level as most people view seeing a girl changing.) In other words, this path is happening because I like the idea of the program conflicting and creating very weird results. Jemini (talk) 10:07, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
Also, yes, he was triggered by the factor of you wanting to take her off alone. He would probably be a lot less resistant if it was done right in front of him from the start. He was even willing to allow the sexual contact at the start, and really the reason he keeps driving at it now has more to do with the fact he got on this kick and doesn't want to back down from what he's already argued. That's an even bigger factor than what I said a moment ago (in the above paragraph.) Jemini (talk) 10:23, 3 March 2021 (UTC)